Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christopher James Hollins's avatar

New York opened its subway system in 1904. That's 121 years ago.

It's never ceased to attract ridership even though the present city government is trying to remedy that by allowing crime.

In 1968, when I was stationed in sight of the downtown skyline there, I found that New York's city rail system covered the area well. I rode in cars that seemed to have been around since the 30s or before.

The concentration of people in Mecklenburg County is probably sufficient for a metropolitan subway system to be feasible. The woke crowd clearly want us all on city owned transportation.

So, what's the problem with a long term financed project to completely bypass the streets with a subway system providing that they are clean and crime free, just like the government center?

I've always valued the freedom of traveling by automobile, but I remember the NYC subway system as being convenient and used by people from all walks of life - very communal.

I think that the "progressives" who control our city should love that. But maybe not since egalitarianism offends against critical race theory.

As to where the money comes from, it's like the Panthers. If the Panthers are such a good business proposition, then there should be no problem in obtaining purely private financing in a city which is home to banks.

If public transportation is the holy grail, then scaring up the long term investment should not be an objection.

After all, if public transportation is a panacea, how can that panacea have an expiration date?,

If we had a rail system as extensive and as attractive as that in the sixties in NYC, I would probably use it myself.

Expand full comment

No posts