Legislators say it's time to re-examine hospital laws
'It’s different today when they’re making billions.'
The following article appeared in the Feb. 26, 2024, edition of The Charlotte Ledger, an e-newsletter with smart and original local news for Charlotte. We offer free and paid subscription plans. More info here.
In response to a Charlotte Ledger/N.C. Health News article on Atrium Health’s status as a government entity, 3 key N.C. legislators say hospital authority rules might be outdated
By Michelle Crouch
Co-published with N.C. Health News
Three North Carolina legislators said they are interested in revisiting the state law that gives special privileges to hospital authorities such as Atrium Health, noting that today’s multi-billion-dollar hospital systems are nothing like the ones lawmakers had in mind when the law was written.
The hospital authorities act was written in 1943, “when a lot of county-owned hospitals were struggling to keep their doors open,” said N.C. Rep. Donny Lambeth (R-Winston-Salem), a former hospital administrator who is a co-chair of the House Health Committee in the state legislature
“It’s different today when they’re making billions.”
Rep. Larry Potts (R-Lexington) and Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Angier) told The Ledger/NC Health News that they, too, have concerns related to the law. Potts is senior chairman of the House’s health committee, and Burgin is a co-chair of the Senate’s health care committee.
The lawmakers’ call for a review comes after a Charlotte Ledger/NC Health News article this month examined the benefits Atrium enjoys as a unit of local government called a “hospital authority.”
Those benefits include the power of eminent domain, which means the hospital can force property owners to sell to make way for hospital expansion; extra tax breaks, even on property that is not being used for medical purposes; and protection from certain federal regulations, including antitrust damages.
Those advantages have helped Atrium grow into a powerful, multi-state hospital chain whose executives receive millions in compensation. With about 39,000 workers, Atrium is the largest corporate employer in the Charlotte region, and the hospital system tied to the authority reported $9.3 billion in annual revenue in 2023. And the company has an additional $19 billion in revenue under its combinations with Wake Forest Baptist and Advocate Aurora Health.
Lambeth said he wants to consider whether the hospital authority law gives Atrium “such an advantage that we need to either enforce or change the law.”
Burgin said he would like to have “some very candid, frank, adult conversations” about the law, asking, “Do these (laws) make sense? And is it right and fair? Because I think some of it is not fair.”
Potts pointed out that much has changed in the 75 years since the original hospital authority act was written. “We need their services and their benefits,” he said. “We also need to look at the costs of what those benefits are.”
The lawmakers also expressed disappointment that Atrium receives those benefits but doesn’t operate in the same open and transparent manner as other government entities.
Atrium: We are fulfilling the original intent of the law
Asked to respond to lawmaker concerns, an Atrium spokesman emailed a statement that said the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, which does business as Atrium Health, “will continue to operate and abide by the law.”
It also said:
Atrium Health continues to fulfill the original intent of the North Carolina Hospital Authorities Act — to “protect the public health, safety, and welfare, including that of low income persons” … With deep roots in every community we are privileged to serve, we proudly embrace our “for all” approach that ensures no patient needing care is turned away because of their ability or inability to pay for their care.
The statement said Atrium provided $2.8 billion in free care and other community benefits in its larger service area in 2022.
Lambeth: ‘They can’t have it both ways’
Atrium has emphasized in court filings that as a governmental unit, it “must comply with North Carolina’s public records and open meetings laws.” However, it doesn’t interpret the public records and open meetings laws in the same way as other government boards.
For example, the authority doesn’t release the agenda for its board meetings in advance or set aside time for the public to speak. It also closes its committee meetings to the public, even though that is where most deliberation happens.
For comparison, CarolinaEast, a hospital authority in Craven County, N.C., does allow the public to attend committee meetings and speak to its board.
“They can’t have it both ways, quite frankly,” Lambeth said of Atrium. “I don’t think you can take advantage in one arena but not another. Either act like a government entity or act like a not-for-profit system.”
All three lawmakers said they think Atrium’s board should follow the state’s open meetings laws in the same way as other appointed and elected government boards. That means conducting deliberations in the public eye, Burgin said.
“If they’re going to be a quasi-governmental agency, they’ve got to play by those rules,” Burgin said. “If they don't want to, then they need to be some other entity. They may have to make a choice — you can do it this way or you can do it that way, but you can’t do it both ways.”
The legislators said they have heard complaints for years that Atrium and other public hospitals have an unfair advantage over the state’s private hospitals. In particular, critics say, lower levels of federal antitrust scrutiny have made it easier for Atrium to merge and combine with other hospitals, allowing them to demand higher reimbursement rates from insurance companies.
What could the legislature do?
The three Republican legislators are influential members of committees that control health care legislation coming out of Raleigh. Republicans hold a supermajority in the House and Senate, and Republican support is essential to pass laws out of the General Assembly.
The General Assembly could consider a number of changes to the law. It could eliminate the hospital authority act altogether, forcing Atrium to convert to a private nonprofit corporation like Novant Health. It could clarify that hospital authority boards must follow the same rules as other public bodies, such as allowing the public to speak and attend committee meetings. Or it could take away some of an authority’s powers, such as the ability to condemn land for hospital expansion or the ability to avoid property taxes on real estate that is not being used for medical purposes.
Legislative actions in recent years have largely leaned toward giving hospital systems more authority and control, not less, said Barak Richman, a Duke University law professor who studies health care financing.
In fact, the most recent proposed change to the hospital authority law was a little-noticed sentence in the 2023 Senate budget bill that didn’t make it into the final state budget.
It would have eliminated the part of the statute that prevents hospital authorities from expanding much past their county borders. Lifting the restriction would have allowed Atrium to start exercising its hospital authority powers outside the Charlotte region and across the state.
Michelle Crouch covers health care. Reach her at mcrouch@northcarolinahealthnews.org.
This article is part of a partnership between The Ledger and North Carolina Health News to produce original health care reporting focused on the Charlotte area. We make these articles available free to all. For more information, or to support this effort with a tax-free gift, click here.
Related Ledger/NC Health News articles:
“Atrium Health is a ‘unit of local government’ like no other” (Feb. 5)
“3 county commissioners check out Atrium’s board meeting” (Feb. 7)
Need to sign up for this e-newsletter? We offer a free version, as well as paid memberships for full access to all 4 of our local newsletters:
➡️ Opt in or out of different newsletters on your “My Account” page.
➡️ Learn more about The Charlotte Ledger
The Charlotte Ledger is a locally owned media company that delivers smart and essential news through e-newsletters and on a website. We strive for fairness and accuracy and will correct all known errors. The content reflects the independent editorial judgment of The Charlotte Ledger. Any advertising, paid marketing, or sponsored content will be clearly labeled.
Like what we are doing? Feel free to forward this along and to tell a friend.
Social media: On Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and LinkedIn.
Sponsorship information/customer service: email support@cltledger.com.
Executive editor: Tony Mecia; Managing editor: Cristina Bolling; Staff writer: Lindsey Banks; Business manager: Brie Chrisman