Do we need a new bridge across the Catawba River?
A new study examines the effects of a proposed 'Catawba Crossing' west of the airport into Gaston County
You’re reading Transit Time, a weekly newsletter for Charlotte people who leave the house. Cars, buses, light rail, bikes, scooters … if you use it to get around the city, we write about it. Transit Time is produced in partnership between The Charlotte Ledger and WFAE.
Some local leaders say a 4-lane road would ease traffic on both sides of the river; Critics say it would lead to sprawl
Gaston County officials are enthusiastic about a new bridge across the Catawba River. But funding is uncertain, and it is at least 20 years away. A recent study examined the effect of the bridge and a 6.5-mile road that would start near Charlotte’s airport. (Source: Catawba Crossings Feasibility Study)
by Tony Mecia
If you’re in Mecklenburg County and want to head west — to Gastonia or Shelby, or to the mountains — you have limited options. The Catawba River is in your way.
There are just four bridges connecting Mecklenburg and Gaston counties, and none along a 10-mile stretch between Wilkinson Boulevard (U.S. 74) and the Buster Boyd Bridge at the Mecklenburg/South Carolina line.
Now, officials in Gaston County are hoping to add another bridge to the list, with a 6.5-mile road. It would link Charlotte’s airport and I-485 in Mecklenburg to southeastern Gaston County.
Gaston officials are pitching it as a chance to improve transportation options, relieve traffic on Wilkinson Boulevard and I-85 and improve travel times for drivers in Mecklenburg, Gaston and York counties. But the idea is also dusting off concerns of environmentalists, who say it’s an unneeded road that bears a striking resemblance to the more ambitious 22-mile “Garden Parkway” toll road plan that was abandoned in 2015.
The 6.5-mile route would run between South New Hope Road in Gaston County, north of the Daniel Stowe Botanical Garden, and Steele Creek Road by Charlotte’s airport. (Source: Catawba Crossings Feasibility Study)
At the moment, there’s no money for the road, dubbed the “Catawba Crossings” project. In a best case scenario, it would take another 20 years or so. Planners recently completed a feasibility study that could help make the case for state funding. It put the cost at $319 million. As far as road projects go, that’s expensive, but less expensive than, say, making planned improvements to I-277 or widening I-77 south of uptown to the South Carolina line.
Viewed as ‘a big help’: In Belmont, drivers from York Country cut through downtown to get to U.S. 74 or I-85 to the north, because they have few other options to get to Charlotte, said Mayor Charlie Martin.
“It would help with the traffic. It would help a lot,” he said. “We have a lot of development coming. … If we don’t get something done — people complain about the traffic all the time. This should be a big help.”
Asked if people would support another bridge just a few years after public opposition helped kill a similar plan, Martin said: “They’ll support it now. We have to have a bridge across that river. Got to.”
The idea for another road across the Catawba raises a familiar question: Do new roads alleviate traffic congestion by providing more options for motorists? Or do they make traffic worse by encouraging more development, which leads to more cars on the roads — a concept known in planning circles as “induced demand”?
The recent study of the Catawba Crossings proposal concluded that the new road would reduce the number of cars on U.S. 74 by 20%, on Steele Creek Road (N.C. 160) and York Road (N.C. 49) by 5%-10% and on I-85 by 1%-3%, compared with not building the road. It would not have a toll.
The areas in Mecklenburg and Gaston counties that would be linked have experienced less development than other parts of the region that are closer to major highways and thoroughfares. Yes, there are developments south of Belmont, and some on the way west of Charlotte’s airport and in Steele Creek. But the population densities in those areas are less than in places with better road connections.
On the Mecklenburg side, the proposed four-lane road would pass through what’s being called the River District, a 1,400-acre master planned development by Crescent Communities, and include a new interchange on I-485. Crescent says it has worked with planners to safeguard land needed for the road, should it materialize.
Chase Kerley, a managing director with Crescent who works on the River District plan, said in a statement to Transit Time: “If thoughtfully planned, we believe that the Catawba Crossing is an incredible opportunity to bridge Mecklenburg and Gaston County from not only economy, employment and entertainment but also in a way that brings our greater communities closer towards a connection to the beauty and stewardship of the Catawba River.”
Planners have also talked with officials at Charlotte’s airport for a possible future tie-in to its intermodal hub, where shipping containers can be transferred between rail and trucks.
Room for bikers, joggers: Another part of the argument in favor of the road is that it won’t be just a road — it could include bike and pedestrian paths and adjacent recreation areas.
“It’s not just about cars and trucks and vehicles,” said Pat Mumford, a former Charlotte City Council member who heads the Gaston Business Association. “This bridge would accommodate cyclists and pedestrians. It’s being very intentional about a multimodal crossing over the river.”
Public reaction: For months, planners and consultants conducted public feedback sessions, surveys and stakeholder interviews. The study includes 509 written public comments reflecting a full range of opinions, which is what you get when you ask what people think. Responses included:
“an extremely needed project”
“please plan for enough lanes as there is booming growth”
“should be very limited number of intersections”
“what about the homes and wildlife”
“get those ***** bicycles off the road”
In an 8-page letter submitted to planners, the Southern Environmental Law Center said the project would have “serious environmental consequences” and “lacks any clear purpose or need.” The letter said construction of the new road would “fuel sprawling car-dependent development outward from Charlotte,” which would result in worse air quality from increased driving.
Most of the enthusiasm for the new road seems to be coming from the Gaston County side. Leading the effort is the Gaston-Cleveland-Lincoln Metropolitan Planning Organization (GCLMPO), a collection of local governments and other officials. It commissioned the study, put together a website with a promotional video and continues to circulate information.
Randi Gates, administrator with the GCLMPO, says the hope is that with the feasibility study concluded, the state would include the project in its next 10-year funding plan. If that happens, it would likely be toward the end of that plan, around 2035, when money would start to come available for design and land acquisition. The best-case timeline would be for completion in the 2040s. But road funding is tight, and there are a lot of needs — so it’s uncertain if the project could win state approval for funding.
On the Mecklenburg side, transportation planners have been involved in the discussions on the Catawba Crossings idea. But it didn’t make it into the 2050 Metropolitan Transportation Plan’s list of top priorities, which identified 156 road projects in Mecklenburg, Union and Iredell counties. Local officials had to choose and were limited by costs, said Bob Cook, director of the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning Organization.
Even if the project takes decades, there are some changes afoot in other Gaston-Mecklenburg corridors:
The N.C. Department of Transportation plans to widen I-85 in Gaston County to eight lanes between Mount Holly and U.S. 321 in Gastonia.
NCDOT also has plans to widen the Wilkinson Boulevard bridge across the Catawba from four lanes to six and add paths for cyclists and pedestrians. The existing bridge was built in 1933 and is known as the Sloans Ferry Bridge, after the ferry service it replaced. Work is expected to start next year.
Wilkinson is also a proposed light rail route for the Lynx Silver Line, which could cross the river and go into Belmont — part of a 29-mile line that would go to uptown and to Matthews and perhaps Union County. Funding for that project is uncertain, too.
The Sloans Ferry Bridge is a section of Wilkinson Boulevard (U.S. 74) that connects Mecklenburg and Gaston counties. It is scheduled to be replaced starting in 2023. Will it have a cousin to the south?
Tony Mecia is executive editor of The Charlotte Ledger. Reach him at email@example.com.
➡️ What do you think? Should the state build another bridge over the Catawba River and link Charlotte’s airport and I-485 more directly to Gaston County? Drop us an email, or leave your thoughts in the comments:
Sales tax hikes rejected: In last month’s election, all five sales tax referendums in North Carolina counties were defeated. Voters rejected efforts to raise sales taxes in Cleveland, New Hanover, Wayne, Macon and Bladen counties. The money would have paid for projects including school construction and transportation needs. Raising the sales tax is viewed in Mecklenburg as critical for helping pay for a future transit plan that would include expanding light rail and the bus system. (N.C. Tribune, subscriber-only)
Bus stops without seats: Fewer than 10% of Charlotte’s 3,000 bus stops have seating, according to a WBTV review of city data. An urbanist group is raising money to help build more seating. An Axios Charlotte article this week examined the urbanist movement.
Circus cars sold: The N.C. Department of Transportation auctioned off three Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus train cars for $29,000 this week. NCDOT bought nine cars for $383,000 in 2017 and hoped to use them for passenger service, but those plans were scuttled when some of the cars were destroyed in a fire while stored near Rocky Mount. (WCNC)
Transit Time is a production of The Charlotte Ledger and WFAE. You can adjust your newsletter preferences on the ‘My Account’ page.
Did somebody forward you this newsletter and you need to sign up? You can do that here:
Other affiliated Charlotte newsletters and podcasts that might interest you:
The Charlotte Ledger Business Newsletter, Ways of Life newsletter (obituaries) and Fútbol Friday (Charlotte FC), available from The Charlotte Ledger.
The Inside Politics newsletter, available from WFAE.
Yes! I just moved to the edge of western Meck Co and travel across the bridge often to Belmont. The lanes are so narrow, I am afraid I will hit another car or the concrete wall. Plus it is very old. I wish it would be earlier than 20yrs. It is definitely needed!
Yes, we need a new bridge. Yes, we need a new light rail regional plan. Yes, we ought to have a regional transportation authority. We need to think comprehensively with a vision for the region for the next 50 or even 100 years. We need to consider fewer roads and examine alternatives as well as how roads, rail, public transportation, and airports provide an interconnected mobility system. Unfortunately, we have multiple government entities with their own individual interests and no pathway for considering the collective interests of the region. Some will point to our Centralina Regional Council, but it is too passive. Others will point to our metropolitan planning organizations, but they too work primarily within their own designated authority. If we really want to make progress, we should learn from cities like Atlanta, Nashville, Austin, Denver, and many others that have organized their collective efforts into a vision and then a plan that gathers support from Republicans and Democrats seeking help from state and federal governments who have the authority to move big projects and make decisions when revenues can be made available. We need leaders to step into this chasm.